Restaurants Consume Five Times More Energy Per Square Foot Than Other Commercial Buildings. Is Your Bill Correct?
The EPA's ENERGY STAR program benchmarks commercial restaurants at energy use intensity nearly five times higher than the average commercial building. The combination of commercial cooking equipment, refrigeration, HVAC in a high-occupancy space, and extended operating hours creates one of the most energy-intensive load profiles in the commercial sector.
The EPA's ENERGY STAR program benchmarks commercial restaurants at energy use intensity nearly five times higher than the average commercial building. The combination of commercial cooking equipment, refrigeration, HVAC in a high-occupancy space, and extended operating hours creates one of the most energy-intensive load profiles in the commercial sector.
For a 4,000 square foot fast-casual restaurant, the EPA estimates $15,000 in annual electricity and gas costs. For a 10,000 square foot full-service restaurant with a large kitchen, that figure routinely exceeds $40,000. For multi-unit operators with 50+ locations, annual utility spend exceeds $2 million.
The billing complexity matches the energy intensity. Restaurant accounts often involve electricity and natural gas from different suppliers, demand charges driven by the coincident start of multiple large loads, and time-of-use rate structures that may or may not fit the restaurant's operating schedule.
The most common billing errors we find in restaurant accounts are demand charge measurement methodology errors, incorrect application of food service rate schedules where they exist, natural gas rate misclassifications for cooking versus space heating loads, and in multi-unit operations, cross-account billing errors where consumption from one location is attributed to another.